Awesome stuff, and would be even more awesome if you do follow ups where you unpack MIIT, MFA, MPS, CFAC, CNCERT, MOFCOM, SAMR, MSS, and maybe few others. I think the framing of how this can inform the US-China track 1s makes sense and is timely, but independent of that, this stuff is just generally good info to have out there (essentially the Decoding Chinese Politics specifically for AI). And because of the opacity of the chinese system, chatbots give pretty mid explanations
Thanks for pulling this together @mattsheehan. Excellent work! One thought ... there is a practical linkage with MOF, as they have been developing guidelines for public procurement of key IcT systems, which presumably include AI. As a percentage of the addressable market, the public sector is huge, so the rules for deploying AI in the public sector matter beyond the domestic market. Might also be a way for US/China to "compare notes" on their approach.
From my non-expert standpoint, this looks like a great foundation for a discussion in the US. If others have additional suggestions, I'm all ears. I am confident that if those with power and AI connections aren't participating in this type of discussion, they don't agree that AI poses serious risks as well as opportunities.
Awesome stuff, and would be even more awesome if you do follow ups where you unpack MIIT, MFA, MPS, CFAC, CNCERT, MOFCOM, SAMR, MSS, and maybe few others. I think the framing of how this can inform the US-China track 1s makes sense and is timely, but independent of that, this stuff is just generally good info to have out there (essentially the Decoding Chinese Politics specifically for AI). And because of the opacity of the chinese system, chatbots give pretty mid explanations
Very insightful, great work @Matt Sheehan!
this is super cool
What if the US is not a stable business partner to talk to about AI at all? As Europe, Canada and other parts of the world are finding out?
Thanks for pulling this together @mattsheehan. Excellent work! One thought ... there is a practical linkage with MOF, as they have been developing guidelines for public procurement of key IcT systems, which presumably include AI. As a percentage of the addressable market, the public sector is huge, so the rules for deploying AI in the public sector matter beyond the domestic market. Might also be a way for US/China to "compare notes" on their approach.
From my non-expert standpoint, this looks like a great foundation for a discussion in the US. If others have additional suggestions, I'm all ears. I am confident that if those with power and AI connections aren't participating in this type of discussion, they don't agree that AI poses serious risks as well as opportunities.